Tell me more ×
SmugMug Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for SmugMug developers and end users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

It would be nice to be able to secure your site by category. Gallery security makes it tough to manage when you have a lot.

I have a lot of family pictures I want secured, but they are in multiple categories. But I would like to have other categories that were public.

share|improve this question
4  
Hi John, welcome to the site. I'm not sure if you're familiar with other StackExchange sites, but this is a question-and-answer format. It sounds like you have a feature request for the SmugMug team, but I don't see a question in your question... which means that you're not going to find an answer here. – ahockley Jan 25 '12 at 22:52
Hey John, you might want to go see if that has already been raised at UserVoice: feedback.smugmug.com and raise it there if not. – cabbey Jan 25 '12 at 23:47
This should probably belong to the meta.smugmug.com – chrisjlee Jan 26 '12 at 2:19
3  
The meta site is for discussing the SmugMug StackExchange site, not for feature requests or SmugMug suggestions. I believe this specific feature has been requested at the UserVoice site. – jsmarble Jan 26 '12 at 19:13

4 Answers

Currently, your best bet would be to leave the galleries as unlisted (with the "hello world" and "hello smuggers" settings turned off in the Gallery Settings to make sure searches don't show them) and then create a sharegroup containing those galleries. Here's the SmugMug help page on Sharegroups:

http://help.smugmug.com/customer/portal/articles/93261

Sharegroups won't show up on your homepage, you'll have to send the link out to folks, and you can set a password so only people with the password can access the galleries.

I've got 3 sharegroups set up at the moment, each for a different group of friends and they work perfectly for keeping my personal images separate from my more public images.

share|improve this answer

Your galleries can be secured on an individual basis. The security can range from marking the gallery as unlisted or enabling a password or both.

I mark my personal galleries as unlisted and usually file them under the family category so I can find them later, but place all client work as public galleries that are passworded when necessary.

share|improve this answer

The above advice are good options. I want to add that if all of the galleries in a category are passworded, then the category will appear to be passworded. Once the password is entered by the visitor, all of the galleries inside will be accessible as long as that cookie is valid. The default is about 2 weeks if I remember correctly.

Making all of the galleries private or unlisted will make the category unlisted.

share|improve this answer
Slight correction: A category will show the lock icon if the first gallery in its list is passworded even if other galleries are not passworded. Also, the password is still per gallery. Not as stated above at the category level. – Mike Kelly Jan 26 '12 at 21:28
you're both right Mike. The password is set in each gallery, but as Doc mentioned, you don't have to enter it on every one, once you've entered it for one it will work for the others, as long as it is the same password on the same account. – cabbey Jan 26 '12 at 23:46

Category-level security controls would solve many common use cases. Sharegroups, password-protected galleries, site-wide passwords, and unlisted galleries all come with their own set of problems and limitations. I wrote a skeleton proposal for a more cohesive security and privacy implementation that also includes category-level security controls, along with a simple but more relevant authorization scheme. You can check it out here:

http://feedback.smugmug.com/forums/17723-smugmug/suggestions/2623874-a-better-solution-for-hosting-both-private-and-pub

Below, I'm re-posting some of the problems I noted with the current offering of security and privacy controls. My suggestion above attempts to address these and make the Smugmug Homepage and site more capable of displaying both a Public and a Private face.

1) Unlisted galleries are a good idea, but they blow the whole Categorical structure. If I have private content I now need to send someone a link, which they'll likely loose in time. I can't send them a private 'Family' category link, and let them browse all of my private family content. But then there's...

2) Sharegroups, which almost solve the above problem, but come with their own. For one they only allow galleries to be added, and since I cannot put a Category in a Sharegroup, I cannot simply say - okay here's all my Family stuff, with all of its subcategories and galleries, and one unlisted link to all of it. On top of that, the entries are static, so I have to manually add galleries as they become available.

3) Site-wide passwords. We all know passwords blow, last thing we want is yet another password to forget. Site-wide passwords are almost cool, except they blow the whole concept of a Homepage, so then, there's no way for me to display any of my public stuff to the anonymous visitor... Or maybe I just want a couple smart galleries to display on my Homepage to people who don't have the site-wide password.

4) Then there's gallery-passwords. So I could just put a password on all my private galleries, and not put one on my public galleries. That might work! But wait, then my Homepage, which I'd like to include Gallery Categories on, would even let people without the passwords browse the whole structure, see all my gallery names, maybe even find some information I didn't want them to see! So now I guess it's back to unlisted galleries and sharegroups again, and back to square 1.

It's a bit maddening. There currently seems to be no easy way to display separate Public and Private views on the Homepage in a way that offers the following:

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.