meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 11 months |
| seen | Nov 21 '12 at 13:04 | |
| stats | profile views | 0 |
|
Jun 20 |
comment |
How is calculated the md5 for pictures in portrait orientation? For the record, Gimp, Digikam, etc, silently do the rotation, which is why opening and saving a portrait photo with either made everything work out fine. I'd prefer to keep my files intact with a correct orientation exif tag, but it seems most apps think it's better to rotate the image itself (maybe for better compatibility?). |
|
Jun 20 |
awarded | Student |
|
Jun 20 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Jun 20 |
accepted | How is calculated the md5 for pictures in portrait orientation? |
|
Jun 20 |
comment |
How is calculated the md5 for pictures in portrait orientation? I can confirm that smugmug silently rotates any files uploaded that are not in landscape orientation in the exif tags. I have not been able, with exiftran, jhead or jpegtran, to generate a rotated jpg with the same md5 as the one smugmug creates, so I don't know how exactly it is rotated. As a workaround I have to manually rotate all my portrait pictures (with jhead for example) so that smugmug doesn't modify what I upload. It is beyond me why smugmug can't deal with the orientation exif tag though. Thank you and tedder42 for the help. |
|
Jun 20 |
comment |
How is calculated the md5 for pictures in portrait orientation? Now that you mention it, images.getInfo does not mention orientation. Maybe Smugmug rotates automatically any picture it receives that is in portrait mode. As soon as I can, I'll try to upload a picture rotated with exiftran to see if it helps. Thanks! |
|
Jun 19 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Jun 19 |
asked | How is calculated the md5 for pictures in portrait orientation? |
|
Jun 19 |
awarded | Analytical |
|
Jun 19 |
answered | Getting a token without manually reauthorizing |
